<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Gyongy on Inflection Quant</title><link>https://inflectionquant.com/tags/gyongy/</link><description>Recent content in Gyongy on Inflection Quant</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://inflectionquant.com/tags/gyongy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Local Volatility: From the Implied Vol Surface to Risk-Neutral Dynamics</title><link>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/local_vol/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/local_vol/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an &lt;a href="https://inflectionquant.com/articles/vol_surface_calibration/"&gt;earlier article&lt;/a&gt; we constructed the implied volatility surface and used it primarily to price vanilla options. But a great deal of what trades is not vanilla. Products like barriers and autocallables depend on the path the underlying takes, not only where it lands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suppose I price a barrier by Monte Carlo. At each step the spot sits at some level, and I need a volatility to advance it. What vol do I use? The surface gives me a vol for every strike, but simulation does not ask about strikes. It asks what volatility the spot experiences at this level, at this moment, which the surface cannot answer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>