<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Options on Inflection Quant</title><link>https://inflectionquant.com/tags/options/</link><description>Recent content in Options on Inflection Quant</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://inflectionquant.com/tags/options/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Monte Carlo Variance Reduction: What We Average, and How We Sample</title><link>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/mc_variance_reduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/mc_variance_reduction/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the article on the &lt;a href="../../articles/feynman_kac/"&gt;Feynman-Kac theorem&lt;/a&gt;, we saw that the price of a derivative can be expressed equivalently as the solution to a deterministic PDE or as the expectation of a discounted payoff under the risk-neutral measure. This gives us two complementary numerical approaches to pricing. For low-dimensional problems with smooth payoffs, finite difference methods on the PDE side are efficient and accurate. For high-dimensional problems, path-dependent payoffs, or models where the PDE is hard to derive, Monte Carlo (MC) on the expectation side becomes the natural choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quanto and Compo Commodity Options: FX's Hidden Role in Pricing and Risk</title><link>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/quanto_and_compo/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/quanto_and_compo/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many of the world&amp;rsquo;s most actively traded commodities are priced in USD, yet end investors and corporates often operate in other currencies. A Canadian oil producer hedging output, a European airline managing jet fuel costs, or an Asian sovereign wealth fund allocating to commodity exposure all face the same underlying issue: commodity risk does not exist in isolation from FX risk. The standard approach is to hedge the commodity leg with USD-denominated futures or swaps and manage FX separately through forwards or options. This works, but it treats the two risks as independent. Quanto and compo options take a different approach by packaging both risks into a single instrument, but the way each handles FX risk creates some pricing and hedging subtleties that I find are easy to miss.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Futures-Style Margined Options: The Absence of Early Exercise Premium</title><link>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/future_style_margining_options/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflectionquant.com/articles/future_style_margining_options/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I first studied options, most textbook examples were equity-style:
you pay a premium upfront, and at expiry (or whenever you choose to exercise, if the
option is American), you receive the payoff. That framing stuck with me for a long time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I started working on commodity derivatives, I encountered a different world. Many
options in commodity markets are traded under futures-style margining. No premium
changes hands at inception, and instead the option is margined daily like a futures
contract. This is common across a wide range of exchange-traded products: options on WTI
crude oil futures at the CME, options on Henry Hub natural gas futures, options on corn
and wheat futures, and options on carbon emissions futures, to name a few.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>